Do Widening Treasury and Mortgage Rates Portend Bad Times Ahead?

The historically wide spread between the10-year U.S. Treasury yield and mortgage rates has become a notable anomaly infinancial markets, drawing attention from economists, policymakers, andhomebuyers alike. Traditionally, the average spread between the 30-year fixedmortgage rate and the 10-year Treasury yield hovers around 170 to 180 basispoints (1.70% to 1.80%). However, starting in 2022 and extending into 2024 and2025, this spread has widened significantly, at times exceeding 300 basispoints. This phenomenon is both historically unusual and economicallyconsequential.

Understanding the Spread

The 10-year Treasury yield is a benchmarkfor long-term interest rates and is closely watched by investors due to itsinfluence on borrowing costs across the economy. Mortgage rates, particularlythe 30-year fixed rate, typically track the 10-year Treasury yield becausemortgage-backed securities (MBS), which banks use to offload home loans, arepriced in relation to Treasury securities. Thus, when Treasurys yield more,mortgage rates rise, and vice versa.

However, the relationship is notone-to-one. The spread reflects not only baseline interest rates but alsolender costs, MBS investor appetite, prepayment risk, credit risk, andregulatory or capital constraints. In periods of economic stability, the spreadremains within a relatively narrow historical range. But in uncertain orvolatile conditions, it can diverge sharply – like it’s doing now.

Why the Spread Has Widened

Several key factors have contributed to thewidened spread in recent years:

1. Interest Rate Volatility: The     Federal Reserve’s aggressive rate hikes beginning in 2022 to combat     inflation caused significant market uncertainty. As Treasury yields     fluctuated sharply, mortgage lenders increased their risk premiums,     widening the spread to protect against interest rate risk and potential     losses from early loan refinancing.
2. Reduced MBS Demand: The Federal     Reserve, once a major buyer of mortgage-backed securities, significantly     reduced its balance sheet holdings under quantitative tightening. This     withdrawal of demand meant private investors needed higher returns to     absorb MBS supply, pushing mortgage rates higher relative to Treasurys.
3. Banking Sector Constraints:     Regional bank instability and tighter financial conditions have made     lenders more cautious. With heightened capital requirements and uncertain     deposit bases, many lenders have added buffers to mortgage pricing.
4. Securitization Friction: Mortgage     lenders package loans into MBS, but when spreads widen and investor     appetite weakens, lenders hold more loans on their balance sheets, raising     funding costs and increasing mortgage rates further.

Implications

This spread has profound implications. Forconsumers, it means borrowing costs remain stubbornly high even as Treasuryyields moderate, pricing many out of the housing market. Housing affordabilityworsens, and home sales slow, dragging on construction activity and broadereconomic momentum.

For policymakers, the distortioncomplicates monetary transmission. The Fed may lower rates, but if mortgagespreads stay elevated, the easing may not meaningfully support the housingmarket. It underscores that Treasury yields alone are no longer sufficientindicators of financial conditions.

Conclusion

The unusually wide spread between the10-year Treasury yield and mortgage rates reflects a confluence of marketvolatility, structural changes in MBS demand, and lender risk aversion. Whilethis may normalize as markets stabilize, it underscores the importance ofviewing interest rates in context—not just by benchmarks, but also by themarket mechanisms that bridge them to real-world costs.

‍